IMHO, I think that the crux of the question is whether, once you have made
such a public disclaimer, whether or not you are legally prevented from
"taking it back". By analogy you can generally withdraw a mere permission
to use a work. Likewise, what legally prevents you from withdrawing the
permission inherent in announcing that the disclaimer is rescinded?
Presumably principles of equity apply where there is acquiescence, but my
guess is that this does not give the clear predictability that proponents of
public domain dedication in copyright disclaimers seek.
John McKie
Trademark Partner
Ladas & Parry LLP
johnm[_at_]ladas.net <mailto:johnm[_at_]ladas.net>
P: 312.427.1300
F: 312.427-6663
www.ladasparry.com <http://www.ladasparry.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: John T. Mitchell [mailto:mitchell[_at_]interactionlaw.com]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 3:41 PM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: [CNI-(C)] Re: [CNI-(C)] Software Licensing
Agreement
On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Joseph Pietro Riolo wrote:
> On 1/30/06, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen[_at_]rosenlaw.com> wrote:
>>
>> . . . a public domain disclaimer has some risks and flaws under
>> current copyright law, which does not make any provision for such
>> disclaimers.
>
> There are always some individuals who claim that disclaiming
> intellectual property rights is not possible. . . .
I complained about this very issue during the so-called "orphan works" inquiry. See http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/reply/ OWR0116-InteractionLaw.pdf ("They Forgot About My Father").
I believe that the First Amendment compels the conclusion that every author must have the right to say "no thanks" at the very moment the law would impose upon the work -- protected speech -- certain exclusive rights that automatically declare that anyone reproducing, publicly performing, publicly displaying, distributing, etc. the work can be hauled into court to pay thousands of dollars in "damages". Millions of people desire that their speech be freely repeated, circulated, built upon, reproduced, disseminated, etc., and the greatest flaw in copyright law is the burden it imposes upon the unwilling authors who do not want the automatic, government imposed "all rights reserved and I may sue you" stamp upon their works.
John
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org>
To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org>
To resume mail list message delivery from postpone mode, E-mail to
<CNI-COPYRIGHT-feed[_at_]cni.org>
Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at <https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT