tja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.au wrote:
>>One such risk is that once dedicated to the public domain a work (the
>>original work "OW") is free to be chopped up, modified and used by
>>whomever, and then locked up as a new copyrighted work with
>>all rights
>>reserved.
>>
>>
>Doesn't the originality test solve this? It does in jurisdictions in the
>British tradition.
>tja
>
>
Yes, a work must be original to be protected, but if you mix parts of a
public domain work with original content to create a new work where do
you draw the line? If there are multiple works based on an underlying
PD work, can the earlier users eat up some of the territory and exclude
others? Disney made millions by producing films based on public domain
stories but then sues others for using the same stories because it's too
close to their work. See e.g. Walt Disney Productions v. Filmation
Associates, 628 F.Supp. 871(1986) (Filmation liable for story boards of
Pinocchio that looked too much like Disney's work). I'm not sure how
this would play out in a computer software scenario, but I'd still
characterize dedication to the public domain as a risk (if the dedicator
wants to continue to modify and develop the software).
-Andy Received on Fri Feb 10 2006 - 04:30:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT