Oh, I don't know: what about infringement by a state instrumentality, which
is infringement but not actionable by virtue of the Eleventh Amendment?
On 2/14/06, J. Noble <jfnbl[_at_]earthlink.com> wrote:
>
>
> We don't have any disagreement on the law or the allocation of the burden.
> My only point was that there is no such thing, conceptually, as a privileged
> infringement.
>
-- Vance R. Koven Boston, MA USA vrkoven[_at_]world.std.comReceived on Wed Feb 15 2006 - 01:24:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT