Re: Conde Nast vs. Blackmask (copyright infringement)

Indeed, one of the more interesting points (to my ignorant eye) raised by the description in the blog was whether a plaintiff is entitled to bring a copyright infringement case before a magistrate. I presume (if the reporting is at all correct) that they were talking about a US Magistrate, but still...

Vance

On 4/11/06, Jon Noring <jon[_at_]noring.name> wrote:
> Most here may have already seen this, but for the few who haven't,
> appears to be a very interesting copyright infrinement case:
>
> For the details and links elsewhere, see:
>
> http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4631
>
> with a small update at:
>
> http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4639
>
>
> Lots of interesting aspects to this case, particulary with regards to
> the Public Domain.
>
> Jon Noring
>
>
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org>
> To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org>
> To resume mail list message delivery from postpone mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-feed[_at_]cni.org>
> Send administrative queries to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>
>
> Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at <https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.
>
>

--
Vance R. Koven
Boston, MA USA
vrkoven[_at_]world.std.com