What about escheat?
On 4/11/06, Steven Jamar <stevenjamar[_at_]gmail.com> wrote:
> How about abandonment through non-exploitation and thus it is in the public
> domain? I think this better than "adverse possession" -- since that would
> work a change of ownership rather than merely a loss of copyright -- but
> still very problematic.
-- Vance R. Koven Boston, MA USA vrkoven[_at_]world.std.comReceived on Thu Apr 13 2006 - 02:00:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT