I passed your question on to Mia Garlick, general counsel of Creative
Commons. Here's what she wrote:
We have crafted some noncommercial guidelines to assist in clarifying what is and is not noncommercial - these are a discussion draft only
The issue of noncommercial was involved in the recent decision in Amsterdam about CC licenses: http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/
5823 where the court found that a commercial publisher had violated
both the Attribution & NonCommercial license limitations.
Unfortunately, the Dutch judge did not engage in a lengthy analysis of the NonCommercial issue so we just have a matter of fact statement. We are hoping to post a more complete English translation of the Dutch decision shortly.
Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com)
Stanford University, Lecturer in Law
3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482
707-485-1242 * fax: 707-485-1243
Author of "Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and
Intellectual Property Law" (Prentice Hall 2004)
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
[mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of Davidson, Matthew T.
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:15 AM
To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
Subject: [CNI-(C)] Creative Commons - "Non-Commercial" use?
Is anyone aware of any litigation or any good secondary literature dealing with the meaning of "non-commercial" in the context of the Creative Commons license?
Any references would be much appreciated.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT