Dodi is quite right in principle -- but in practice the false assertion has
a chilling effect. It places the (prohibitably expensive) burden of proof
on the end user to prove the false claim of copyright.
IA also NAL.
Amalyah Keshet
Head of Image Resources & Copyright Management
The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
<snip>
>> ...but are those who assert ownership (thus depriving the public of
>> free access to use that material) liable for that?
Why would making that false assertion about a work in the public domain deprive anyone else? A mere assertion doesn't make something so. The assertion wouldn't actually REMOVE the work from the public domain.
IA a writer, NAL.
--DS Received on Mon May 29 2006 - 20:35:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT