A previous poster on this list wrote: "The market value of a brief is pretty
low -- almost nothing except in the particular case. So the incentive to
stop infringement is pretty low."
Apparently, one well-known class-action law firm disagrees. See "Milberg Weiss Tries to Nail Class Action Imitators," http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1036630458145 -- in which a lawyer is quoted as saying: "The other plaintiffs' firms, who don't have the same experience, support or expertise that Milberg does, are taking the complaints that have been written, investigated and drafted by the Milberg attorneys. They're copying those complaints and filing them in the same case."
Under this argument, the complaints have value to other lawyers (and the clients of those lawyers).
Does anyone know what became of these copyright infringement allegations?
Doug Isenberg
Attorney at Law: http://www.GigaLawFirm.com
Publisher, GigaLaw.com: http://www.GigaLaw.com
Author, The GigaLaw Guide to Internet Law: http://www.GigaLaw.com/guide
Received on Wed Jun 28 2006 - 09:46:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:56 GMT