I have a serious legal problem with trying to do by contract what the
statute does not allow. The statute has the first sale doctrine in
it. The copyright holder has few rights in how that single physical
copy gets used. The copyright owner just has rights regarding
reproduction, derivative works, performance, display, etc. And even
then the right to display one's own copy goes with the copy, not the
copyright in the intellectual work.
Surely the desire of the publisher of the workbooks is to sell new ones every year, or daily or whatever. But, that does not make an owner of a workbook an infringer when the owner frustrates that desire. I can do the math workbook by requiring the answers to be written on a separate sheet of paper. Does anyone claim that this common practice violates copyright?
Where then is the relevant distinction between that and a laminate cover that allows one to write and erase the answers?
No. Copyright does not extend this far. And should not.
Steve
-- Prof. Steven Jamar Howard University School of LawReceived on Wed Aug 30 2006 - 00:35:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:57 GMT