Re: Re: Derivative Inquiry

From: David Dailey <david.dailey[_at_]sru.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:55:00 -0400


At 03:55 PM 8/28/2006, Terry Carroll wrote:

>In the Ninth Circuit, with its absurd Mirage Editions, Inc. v.
>Albuquerque A.R.T. Co. case [...]

Wasn't that the same circuit that approved search warrants to look for highlighting pens since the primary use of them seems to be creating unauthorized derivative works ?

If too many people start applying the first sale doctrine, then publishers will just start shrinkwrapping their products. Copyright law is so passé.

David Dailey (just kidding, BTW) Received on Wed Aug 30 2006 - 22:55:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:57 GMT