RE: Re: Acknowledging samples

From: Agenbroad, James \(Civ,ARL/CISD\) <jagenbro[_at_]arl.army.mil>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:05:30 -0400


One of the islands of black and white in a sea grey is the decision that "My Sweet Lord" infringes upon "He's so fine."

-----Original Message-----
From: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property [mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:25 PM To: CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property Subject: [CNI-(C)] Re: [CNI-(C)] Acknowledging samples

Into the swamp with this one!

For some music, what seems to be music is really just a beat and such a pedestrian tune that the copyright in it is very, very thin. For example, the talking blues genre cannot be tied up by copyrighting a blues song. And so it is for the blues chord progression in general. And for the basic rock cord progression, and so on. Nor can a shuffle rhythm, swing, rumba, cha-cha-cha, rap, hip-hop, etc. Nor disco.

But, at some point the combination becomes copyrightable, creative, original expression.

But that point is hard to define, especially for ordinary, pedestrian renditions of disco or rap or country or rock.

So, your choir's song could be just a sound alike because at some level so much of that type sounds alike (like all manilow sounds like manilow or fogarty sounds like fogarty), but it might still be original and not infringing as either a copy or derivative work.

"Inspired by" is generally not infringing unless it is really a copy or is less inspired by than derived from.

Steve

On 9/14/06, Varvel, Virgil <vvarvel[_at_]uillinois.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Quick question. Our choir was practicing a song last night. As I was
> listening to it, I realized that the primary beat of the song was
taken from
> an old disco tune of all places. On the music, there was no
attribution to
> where this melody came from, only to the lyrics and the arrangement.
My
> question is whether you can take from another artist in this way
without
> attribution? First, is this alright within copyright law? It seemed
to be
> similar to plagiarism to me as well, since there is no credit given.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
>
> Illinois Online Network
>
> University Outreach and Public Service
>
> University of Illinois
>
> Vvarvel[_at_]uillinois.edu
>
>

-- 
Prof. Steven Jamar
Howard University School of Law

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
     the mailing list <CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CNI-COPYRIGHT-off[_at_]cni.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-digest[_at_]cni.org>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-index[_at_]cni.org>
To postpone your subscription, E-mail to <CNI-COPYRIGHT-null[_at_]cni.org>
To resume mail list message delivery from postpone mode, E-mail to
<CNI-COPYRIGHT-feed[_at_]cni.org>
Send administrative queries to  <CNI-COPYRIGHT-request[_at_]cni.org>

Visit the CNI-COPYRIGHT e-mail list archive at
<https://mail2.cni.org/Lists/CNI-COPYRIGHT/>.
Received on Fri Sep 15 2006 - 17:05:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:57 GMT