On 10/2/06, Smith, Robert E. <smithre[_at_]ctsfw.edu> wrote:
>
Notwithstanding Mr. Noble's post, I do object to it. The thread contains conflicting information. It is silent on the abuse of sacred symbol and doctrines for one's own commercial interests and for one's own attempt to control and censor the uses of the logo. It is simply wrong to link to the thread that encourages the use of the religious symbols for the making of money and for control and censorship.
Now that I have given my objection, you are now bound to my objection until the time I withdraw it.
The lesson from this is that too much deference to any one's whim and too much politeness can trap you and destroy your freedom to share the information with others.
Joseph Pietro Riolo
<josephpietrojeungriolo[_at_]gmail.com>
Number of days left until 1-1-2019 when all knowledge of 1923 in the land of the U.S.A. will be freed from their copyright owners' prisons: 4,472
Public domain notice: I put all of my expressions in this post in the public domain. Received on Wed Oct 04 2006 - 06:59:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:57 GMT