Re: Re: Copyright of lists - Response to Mark Reinmiller

From: Michael Dodson <md06f[_at_]fsu.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:58:32 -0500


How about warping it up in a little DRM (digital rights management) software?

Raymond Dowd wrote:
> Mark - The case law interpreting the Copyright Act gives you little
> hope for protecting this "sweat of the brow" - your valuable labor - in
> compiling this information. Remember though, you might be able to keep
> it private in a number of ways and restrict copying and access through
> contractual arrangements.
>
>
> Raymond J. Dowd
>
> Partner
>
> Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller, LLP
>
> 477 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor
>
> New York, NY 10022
>
> Tel: (212) 682-8811
>
> Fax: (212) 661-7769
>
> rdowd[_at_]dunnington.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
> [mailto:CNI-COPYRIGHT[_at_]cni.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Reinmiller
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:55 PM
> *To:* CNI-COPYRIGHT -- Copyright & Intellectual Property
> *Subject:* [CNI-(C)] Re: Copyright of lists
>
> I have been working on publishing a list of date codes based upon
> manufacturer's serial numbers. This would be useful to a certain
> industry and manufacturer's typically do not make this information
> public. I have decoded much of the information myself.
> From my reading of the recent posts, it appears that no matter how much
> effort I put into developing this information, the information is
> basically facts and therefore not copyrightable. The format I chose in
> publishing the information may be, but it appears that I would have
> little protection if someone else chose to publish the same information
> in a slightly different format. Is my take on this correct?
> Thanks,
> Mark Reinmiller
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail message
> and any attachment is confidential information intended for the use of
> the individual or entity named in this message. This information may be
> protected by attorney/client privilege, work product privilege or
> other laws, rules, and regulations providing for the protection of
> confidential communications. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any retention, use, copying or forwarding of
> this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in
> error, please contact the sender of this message by return e-mail and
> delete this message and any attachments.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * *
>
> *IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE:*
>
> To ensure our compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform
> you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this document cannot be used
> for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue
> Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
> transaction or matter that is contained in this document. Despite the
> Confidentiality Note above, there is no limitation on disclosure by the
> intended recipient of the tax treatment or tax structure of the
> transaction that is the subject of the written advice.*
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *
>
Received on Sat Jan 20 2007 - 19:58:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:57 GMT