From: SMTP%"thardy[_at_]mail.wm.edu" 24-SEP-1993 17:58:29.45
Mary Brandt Jensen spoke about preserving e-materials, and I suggested that they did not deteriorate the way paper materials do and so did not need the same statutory provisions for archival copies.
MBJ's reply is a good argument that I am wrong on the point:
> If the deterioration rationale does not apply to electronic copies,
> why then did CONTU recommend a backup right for software? The
> report indicates that it was specifically because of the fragile
> nature of electronic storage. Electronic copies do not deteriorate
> *if and only if* they are constantly refreshed by recopying (which
> happens to be technically reproduction). The U.S. government has
> released a number of reports on the fragility of electronic media.
>
Ok. I'll have to think more about it.
--Trotter Hardy
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | thardy[_at_]mail.wm.edu | Prof. I. Trotter Hardy | | Voice: (804) 221-3826 | Marshall-Wythe School of Law | | Fax: (804) 221-3261 | College of William & Mary | | BBS: (804) 221-1137 | Williamsburg, VA 23187 | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+Received on Tue Sep 28 1993 - 02:35:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:10 GMT