Glen Tenny writes:
>
> My point was that electronic materials are NOT commonly licensed, they are
> sold. There are far more sales every day of such products than there are
> of licensed databases. If there is a signed licensing agreement, then
> that probably applies (does it apply when it precludes fair use?).
>
> Electronic materials are commonly sold, not licensed. Mead Data and
What difference does it make, whether one characterizes a transaction as a "sale" or as a "license?" I suspect that that is not the relevant distinction. The Act does have a "first sale" provision in section 109, but the relevant distinction there is between the "work of authorship" and a particular "copy" of the work. Rights to resell inhere in a "copy" not in the "work."
For what purpose do you want to make the sale-license distinction?
--Trotter Hardy
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | thardy[_at_]mail.wm.edu | Prof. I. Trotter Hardy | | Voice: (804) 221-3826 | Marshall-Wythe School of Law | | Fax: (804) 221-3261 | College of William & Mary | | BBS: (804) 221-1137 | Williamsburg, VA 23187 | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+Received on Tue Sep 28 1993 - 20:25:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:10 GMT