Re: use of electronic materials

From: Trotter Hardy <thardy[_at_]mail.wm.edu>
Date: 28 Sep 93 13:19:06


Glen Tenny writes:
>
> My point was that electronic materials are NOT commonly licensed, they are
> sold. There are far more sales every day of such products than there are
> of licensed databases. If there is a signed licensing agreement, then
> that probably applies (does it apply when it precludes fair use?).
>
> Electronic materials are commonly sold, not licensed. Mead Data and

What difference does it make, whether one characterizes a transaction as a "sale" or as a "license?" I suspect that that is not the relevant distinction. The Act does have a "first sale" provision in section 109, but the relevant distinction there is between the "work of authorship" and a particular "copy" of the work. Rights to resell inhere in a "copy" not in the "work."

For what purpose do you want to make the sale-license distinction?

        --Trotter Hardy

  +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
  |  thardy[_at_]mail.wm.edu           |     Prof. I. Trotter Hardy         |
  |  Voice: (804) 221-3826        |     Marshall-Wythe School of Law   |
  |  Fax:   (804) 221-3261        |     College of William & Mary      |
  |  BBS:   (804) 221-1137        |     Williamsburg, VA 23187         |
  +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
Received on Tue Sep 28 1993 - 20:25:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:10 GMT