>Gloria Bowman asked:
> >Can anyone explain why some textbooks (& other books perhaps) have a
> >1995 copyright date, for example, in the book although the book was
> >published in 1993?
>
> Can't answer your question, but I SUSPECT it has something to do with
> prolonging "shelf-life". Or, could it be extending "copyright life"?
> The practice annoys me - even without knowing why it is done. It seems
> to be similar to deceptive advertising, if not that, surely deceptive
> something. I eagerly await a response - benign, I hope.
I might mention that fraudulent copyright notice is punishable by a $2500 fine pursuant to 17 USC 506(c). That may be per copy :-)
---
Micah Stolowitz
Marger Johnson McCollom & Stolowitz, P.C.
Patent, Trademark and Copyright Attorneys
650 American Bank Building, Suite 650
Portland, Oregon 97205
Telephone: +1 503-222-3613
FAX: +1 503-274-4622
Internet: micah[_at_]techlaw.com
UUCP: ...!uunet!techlaw.com!micah
Received on Thu Jan 06 1994 - 00:32:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:11 GMT