Copyright Date

From: Micah D. Stolowitz Esq. <micah[_at_]TechLaw.Com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 94 16:29:35 -0800

>Gloria Bowman asked:
> >Can anyone explain why some textbooks (& other books perhaps) have a
> >1995 copyright date, for example, in the book although the book was
> >published in 1993?
>
> Can't answer your question, but I SUSPECT it has something to do with
> prolonging "shelf-life". Or, could it be extending "copyright life"?
> The practice annoys me - even without knowing why it is done. It seems
> to be similar to deceptive advertising, if not that, surely deceptive
> something. I eagerly await a response - benign, I hope.

     I might mention that fraudulent copyright notice is punishable by a $2500 fine pursuant to 17 USC 506(c). That may be per copy :-)

---
Micah Stolowitz
Marger Johnson McCollom & Stolowitz, P.C.	
Patent, Trademark and Copyright Attorneys				
650 American Bank Building, Suite 650					
Portland, Oregon  97205				
 	 

   	Telephone:	+1 503-222-3613
   	  FAX:		+1 503-274-4622
    	Internet: 	micah[_at_]techlaw.com  

	UUCP: 		...!uunet!techlaw.com!micah
Received on Thu Jan 06 1994 - 00:32:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:11 GMT