Sheldon Hapern writes:
>
> Here again we're dealing with very specific kinds of immunities and
> privileges. The court, in writing its opinion, however misguided it may
> be, is absolutely privileged (i.e., immune) from liability; one who
> reports on that proceeding is also privileged (by a different recognized
> privilege). A complaint, as part of a legal proceeding, is immune.
> Jurisdictions differ, however, as to when the immunity attaches (e.g.,
> upon filing, serving the complaint, etc.) I doubt that anyone would
> immunize a prospective complaint shown to students (nor is there any
> reason to do so, pedagogical or otherwise, if the content is defamatory).
> The issue is, and ought to be complicated since, at bottom, someone's
> reputation is involved.
>
I agree that judicial opinions are absolutely privleged and that to my
knowledge reporting on the filing of a complaint would also be privileged.
Also, I willing concede that there is no articulated privilege for class
room discussion. Yet I still feel relatively comfortable in discussing
matters in a classroom that are reported in the media without fear of
libel suits. Indeed, I often use hypotheticals that might arguably be
libelous because the situations are drawn from widely reported events
so that the atribution by name is not really relevant - everyone knows
to whom the hypo refers.
Perhaps I live in a fool's paradise but I just don't believe that I have much to worry about absent the wilfull disclosure of defamatory material relating to a student in my class (a sharp hypo suggested by another participant on this list). I wonder why I have given this matter so little attention given the applicable legal princples.
I suspect that Sheldon is correct in stating that many cases are covered by other privileges. In other situations the person libeled is arguably a public figure. Also, I feel that a plaintiff could not show much in the way of damages from such a republication. In any event I have not been persuaded that I should change my practice of using newsworthy items in my class even though those matters may be defamatory.
Don Berman --
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Donald H. Berman | (617) 373-3346 |
| Richardson Professor of Law | FAX: (617) 373-8793 |
| Northeastern University | Internet: |
| School of Law | berman[_at_]ccs.neu.edu |
| 400 Huntington Ave. | |
| Boston, MA 02115 | |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Mon Feb 07 1994 - 00:28:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:11 GMT