The bill makes more sense if you view it as a limitation of "submarine"
patents rather than an extension. Timing the term from filing should
encourage patent applicants to respond promptly to examiners rather
than intentionally draw out the pre-issuance process. Many patent
owners will receive more than a 17 year term from issuance, and owners
could obtain damages for the pre-issuance period from persons who have
actual knowledge of the application (i.e., potential licensees who
decide instead to infringe, or persons who review the published
application). So, it seems a balanced approach.
Seth Greenstein
<sethg[_at_]access.digex.net>
Received on Tue Mar 08 1994 - 15:33:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:11 GMT