To James N. Myers <booksrus[_at_]astro.ocis.temple.edu>
So, in your view, whether a work is a parody cannot be determined by its content? And it has to be determined, under the fourth factor, by its impact on the _potential_ market for the work?
How come the Court knows pornography when it sees it, but not parody?
Seth Greenstein
<sethg[_at_]access.digex.net>
Received on Sun Mar 13 1994 - 03:10:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:11 GMT