My understanding of the US Constitution with respect to Copyright is
that it places specific limits on what Congress can and cannot legislate.
Therefore, in constitutional terms, Congress cannot take "a view" that
copyright is "purely a means to an end" without amending the constitution.
Also, the US constitution as far as I read it means that copyright is not
"property" but a limited monopoly allowed to authors, etc. Of course, what
the constitution states and the reality of Congress' actions are as
different in this case as in other areas.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:11 GMT