>> Re RAM as "fixation"
>
>There's a difference between common sense and legal interpretation.
>There is US case law that views holding a document in RAM is embodiment,
>and the concerned federal agencies have that view. And it appears from
>postings like those from Jamie Wodetzki in Australia, that it's a view
>pretty much shared globally.
>
>So I'd say the question isn't whether we agree; the question is whether
>the view will or should be incorporated in the general revision of
>copyright law that's surely coming.
>- Mike Bradley
Changing this is alluring. It might take some of the pressure off of the copyright law as it tries to cover electronic media, especially the Information Superhighway.
However, this would not be a panacea. In many of the cases where RAM copies are a problem, such as transferring e-mail across the Internet, or reading an electronic document from disk, there is a good chance that other copies would be made as a matter of course.
Paging overflow pages to disk has been common practice for decades. Windows even tries to do it. Real operating systems actually succeed. Some of the Internet works by moving files from one machine to the next, where if a message needs 5 hops, you will ultimately have 6 copies. Finally, much of this can end of on tape or some similar medium through normal, scheduled, archival backups.
Copyright 1995 by Bruce E. Hayden, All Rights Reserved. This work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution, as long as the copying is not for commercial gain.
Bruce E. Hayden 7604 Vail Valley Drive bhayden[_at_]acm.org Austin, Texas 78749 bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.com (512) 892-7915Received on Fri Mar 31 1995 - 13:11:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:15 GMT