Mark Lemley responds:
>
> You are assuming that the shrinkwrap controlled the terms of the
> transaction with the first purchaser -- court decisions are pretty
> uniformly to the contrary.
>
> But if you do make that assumption, there is a simple answer -- every
> shrinkwrap license I have seen prohibits you from selling or
> transferring the software to someone else without permission. So the
> answer is, you had no right to sell it to them in the first place.
> (Also, better not give software as a Christmas present . . .)
I am sure that Mark actually questions your original assumption - that the original transaction was controlled by shrinkwrap. He has recently published an excellent law review article out that addresses shrinkwrap at great depth.
Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Austin, Texas bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.comReceived on Wed Oct 11 1995 - 12:59:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:18 GMT