CNI-COPYRIGHT by date

SubjectAuthorDate
Re: Copyright term extensionLarry UrbanskiFriday, 1 March
Re: New editions of public domain worksMaurice RobinsonFriday, 1 March
Re: Photographic ReproduMary Brandt JensenFriday, 1 March
Re: Unintentional copyright infringementMartin MedeirosFriday, 1 March
Re: EC Copyright Term Extension - Another AngleBernard KatzFriday, 1 March
Re: Attribution Rightkcrews[_at_]velcome.iupui.eduFriday, 1 March
re: UK Copyright, Copyright ExtensionLarry UrbanskiThursday, 29 February
Magazine covers in CollageLinda BarretteThursday, 29 February
Re: ProCD v. ZeidenbergPatrice A. LyonsThursday, 29 February
RE: Are Bibliographic Citations Facts?John NobleThursday, 29 February
RE: Are Bibliographic Citations Facts?Karen CoyleThursday, 29 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSTrotter HardyThursday, 29 February
Re: New editions of publSpectrum PressThursday, 29 February
Re: Copyright term extensionS. Keith GrahamThursday, 29 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsSpectrum PressThursday, 29 February
Re: Unintentional copyright infringementHBotterbus[_at_]aol.comThursday, 29 February
Re: Attribution RightJonathan FranklinThursday, 29 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSJonathan FranklinThursday, 29 February
Re: Photographic Reprodchamel[_at_]InfoChan.COMThursday, 29 February
Sweat CopyrightsKarjala, DennisThursday, 29 February
AARL StatementNeil NetanelWednesday, 28 February
Copyright ExtensionKarjala, DennisWednesday, 28 February
PBL and copyrightJ. PiccianoWednesday, 28 February
Michigan case draws protest from writersSarah WernickWednesday, 28 February
no subject (file transmission)Ron B. ThomsonWednesday, 28 February
Re: New editions of public domain workschamel[_at_]InfoChan.COMWednesday, 28 February
Re: Copyright term extensionChristopher HyunWednesday, 28 February
Re: JRRT's LotR PD?Wayne G. HammondTuesday, 27 February
Re: New editions of public domain worksjamie wodetzkiFriday, 18 September
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls caseMaurice RobinsonTuesday, 27 February
For the nonlawyers out there, FYIEugene VolokhTuesday, 27 February
Re: New editions of public domain worksTimothy Arnold-MooreTuesday, 27 February
RE: Are Bibliographic Citations Facts?John RosenbergTuesday, 27 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSTerry CarrollMonday, 26 February
The Ultimate Copyright ProtectionLorraine GehringMonday, 26 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSJohn NobleMonday, 26 February
EC Copyright Term Extension - Another AngleGary LeaMonday, 26 February
Re: Unintentional copyright infringementMartin PerlbergerMonday, 26 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSJeffrey FriedmanMonday, 26 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsBuford TerrellMonday, 26 February
Re: Photographic ReproductionBuford TerrellMonday, 26 February
Re: Attribution RightMark LemleyMonday, 26 February
Re: Cable Retransmission ExemptionStephen M. LawMonday, 26 February
Re: International Patent QuestionStephen M. LawMonday, 26 February
re: Dead Sea Scrolls CaseTrotter HardyMonday, 26 February
Re: Attribution RightLaura N. GasawayMonday, 26 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsSpectrum PressMonday, 26 February
Re: Photographic ReprodSpectrum PressMonday, 26 February
Re: Unintentional copyright infringementEsoteric Resources IncorporatedMonday, 26 February
Re: Unintentional copyright infringementBruce HaydenMonday, 26 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSTerry CarrollMonday, 26 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Bruce HaydenMonday, 26 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsBruce HaydenMonday, 26 February
Re: Unintentional copyright infringementGreg ElinMonday, 26 February
Law Students Protest the CDACharles Glasser/NYU LawMonday, 26 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Joseph P. RioloMonday, 26 February
Re: New editions of public domain worksLesley Ellen HarrisMonday, 26 February
"Thin" CopyrightsKarjala, DennisSunday, 25 February
Re: Photographic ReproductionKarjala, DennisSunday, 25 February
re: UK CopyrightKarjala, DennisSunday, 25 February
Photographic Reproduction and CopyrightKarjala, DennisSunday, 25 February
re: Dead Sea Scrolls CaseKarjala, DennisSunday, 25 February
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls caseMark LevinsonSunday, 25 February
International Patent QuestionChris Lansing HolmSunday, 25 February
Looking for a research topicGerald M. BluhmSunday, 25 February
Unintentional copyright infringementBob ShaverFriday, 23 February
Re: UK CopyrightBruce HaydenSaturday, 24 February
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls (& Sweat of the Brow)SouplineSaturday, 24 February
Re: Copyright and multimediaDirceu PereiraSaturday, 24 February
Re: New editions of public domain worksBernard KatzSaturday, 24 February
RE: Are Bibliographic Citations Facts?Karen CoyleFriday, 23 February
Re: Photographic ReproduKaren CoyleFriday, 23 February
Economics of intellectual propertyMark LemleyFriday, 23 February
Re: Photographic ReproduMark LemleyFriday, 23 February
FeistMark LemleyFriday, 23 February
E-Wrongs/E-RightsAlexandra Owens/ASJAFriday, 23 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsSpectrum PressFriday, 23 February
Attribution RightDavid PostFriday, 23 February
Re: Originality and Creativity in West WorksLaura N. GasawayFriday, 23 February
Re: UK CopyrightODI LIBRARYWednesday, 23 February
re: Copyright Notice for Hypertext CoursebookGreg ElinFriday, 23 February
Re: UK Copyrightwing_m[_at_]southampton-institute.ac.ukFriday, 23 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Prof. Charles OppenheimFriday, 23 February
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls caseMartin PerlbergerFriday, 23 February
Re: Copyright and multimediaJohn NobleThursday, 22 February
Cable Retransmission Exemption?jamie wodetzkiMonday, 14 September
Re: Photographic ReproduSoupline Thursday, 22 February
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls (& Sweat of the Brow)Norman SiebrasseThursday, 22 February
Re: Copyright and multimediaBruce BertramThursday, 22 February
6th Circuit Princeton Univ Press vs. Michigan Document Services at Emory Law SiteDavid D. KingThursday, 22 February
Re: Photographic Reprodu and copyrightChristopher HyunThursday, 22 February
The Little MermaidCheryllThursday, 22 February
Re: Photographic ReproduLee TienThursday, 22 February
WIPO Reports -- Part IVSeth GreensteinThursday, 22 February
WIPO Report -- LastSeth GreensteinThursday, 22 February
WIPO Reports - -Part IIISeth GreensteinThursday, 22 February
WIPO Report -- Part IISeth GreensteinThursday, 22 February
WIPO Reports -- Part ISeth GreensteinThursday, 22 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesPaul HealdThursday, 22 February
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls caseNeil NetanelThursday, 22 February
New editions of public domain worksNeil NetanelThursday, 22 February
re: Dead Sea ScrollsMark LevinsonThursday, 22 February
Re: Photographic ReproduNorman SiebrasseThursday, 22 February
Are Bibliographic Citations Facts?John RosenbergWednesday, 21 February
Re: Photgraphic ReproduNorman SiebrasseThursday, 22 February
Re: UK Copyrightjamie wodetzkiSunday, 13 September
Re: Originality and Creativity in West WorksSJamar[_at_]aol.comThursday, 22 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsBuford TerrellThursday, 22 February
Re: Audio RecordingsBob RosenbergThursday, 22 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSBob RosenbergThursday, 22 February
Re: UK CopyrightNeil NetanelWednesday, 21 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesS. Keith GrahamWednesday, 21 February
Princeton v. MDSMark LemleyWednesday, 21 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionMartin PerlbergerWednesday, 21 February
Re: Originality and Creativity in West WorksAlan SugarmanWednesday, 21 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesMark LemleyWednesday, 21 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesBuford TerrellWednesday, 21 February
Re: Photo Reprod/Thin CR/New TechnologyLGAARD[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 21 February
Fair Use Decision on the Web (Princeton v. MDS)Jonathan FranklinWednesday, 21 February
Re: Query: What's the origin of the term "intellectual propery?"Pascal KaminaWednesday, 21 February
Re: Originality and Creativity in West WorksMark LemleyWednesday, 21 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionBruce BertramWednesday, 21 February
Re: Photographic ReproduKarjala, DennisWednesday, 21 February
Re: Registration software?Pete McMullenWednesday, 21 February
Re: Georgia AG opinion on fair use (fwd)Paul HealdWednesday, 21 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesDavid PostWednesday, 21 February
Re: Photographic ReproduNorman SiebrasseWednesday, 21 February
Re: Georgia AG opinion on fair use (fwd)Henry ReedWednesday, 21 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Laura N. GasawayWednesday, 21 February
Copyright and AI/Virtual Reality.Tarcisio CerqueiraWednesday, 21 February
Copyright and multimediaTarcisio CerqueiraWednesday, 21 February
re: the Dead Sea Scrolls caseMark LevinsonWednesday, 21 February
Re: copyright statutes of countries on WWW sitesDavid SwarbrickWednesday, 21 February
Limiting implied warrantiesDavid J. StoverWednesday, 21 February
Re: Audio RecordingsCharles McGarryWednesday, 21 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressWednesday, 21 February
Australian/OECD Conference Report (fwd)jamie wodetzkiSaturday, 12 September
Electronic rights controversy at Chicago TribuneIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 21 February
re: west copyright in page numbersMaurice RobinsonWednesday, 21 February
Re: Registration software?Richard Alan AndersonTuesday, 20 February
Re: Audio RecordingsBernard KatzWednesday, 21 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSBruce BertramWednesday, 21 February
Re: UK CopyrightBernard KatzWednesday, 21 February
Re: Photographic ReproduKarjala, DennisWednesday, 21 February
re: Georgia AG opinion on fair useSJamar[_at_]aol.comWednesday, 21 February
6th Circuit Opinion in Princeton Univ. Press v. MI Document Servs.Samuel Lewis, Esq.Tuesday, 20 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionGeorge GaltTuesday, 20 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsKarjala, DennisTuesday, 20 February
AAP Press ReleaseBarbara PolanskyTuesday, 20 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionTed LabuzaTuesday, 20 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentiveschamel[_at_]InfoChan.COMTuesday, 20 February
Registration software?Albert HendersonTuesday, 20 February
Re: "Thin Copyright" in Databases (WAS Photographic ReproductionJ. NobleTuesday, 20 February
Re: Photographic ReproduJ. NobleTuesday, 20 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesJ. NobleTuesday, 20 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Christopher G. WrenMonday, 19 February
Re: copyright statutes of countries on WWW sitesTimothy Arnold-MooreTuesday, 20 February
Inducing Infringement??John M. StecTuesday, 20 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Joseph P. RioloTuesday, 20 February
Re: Originality and Creativity in West WorksTimothy Arnold-MooreMonday, 19 February
re: west copyright in page numbersMartin PerlbergerMonday, 19 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesMartin PerlbergerMonday, 19 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSJason GullMonday, 19 February
Re: Registration software?Terry CarrollMonday, 19 February
Re: Originality and CreSpectrum PressMonday, 19 February
Audio RecordingsKevin ClarkeMonday, 19 February
Re: Photographic ReproduS. Keith GrahamMonday, 19 February
JRRT's LotR PD?Charles E. KellerMonday, 19 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSoupline Monday, 19 February
Re: Photographic ReproduMark LemleyMonday, 19 February
Need advice on Copyright Notice for Hypertext CoursebookGeorg FuellenMonday, 19 February
Re: Sui generisCNI-COPYRIGHT ModeratorMonday, 19 February
Georgia AG opinion on fair use (fwd)David LeichtmanMonday, 19 February
Summer Study Abroad ProgramEmilio VianoMonday, 19 February
Query: What's the origin of the term "intellectual propery?"Robert A. BaronMonday, 19 February
Re: "Thin Copyright" in Databases (WAS Photographic ReproductionGary LeaMonday, 19 February
Re: "INTERNET" (tm) ????Julia E. HarmatzSunday, 18 February
Re: UK CopyrightTerry CarrollSunday, 18 February
Re: Unfair Trade Practices and CopyrightJohn YoungSaturday, 17 February
copyright statutes of countries on WWW sitesAlberto Maria GallottiSaturday, 17 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesNorman SiebrasseSaturday, 17 February
Re: Not fit to print in The New York TimesDayna BrowneSaturday, 17 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesDavid PostSaturday, 17 February
re: west copyright in page numbersMaurice RobinsonSaturday, 17 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionMaurice RobinsonSaturday, 17 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionDirceu PereiraSaturday, 17 February
Re: "Thin" copyrightsBuford TerrellSaturday, 17 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesBuford TerrellSaturday, 17 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSBruce BertramFriday, 16 February
Re: Originality and Creativity in West WorksJoseph P.BauerFriday, 16 February
Re: software patent guidelinesBruce BertramFriday, 16 February
International copyright: electronic databasesRoberto BonanzingaFriday, 16 February
Re: Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSTerry CarrollFriday, 16 February
Re: Registration software?IntervidFriday, 16 February
Re: Photographic ReproduRobert H. RotsteinFriday, 16 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesMark LemleyFriday, 16 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Alan SugarmanFriday, 16 February
Re: Photographic ReproduNorman SiebrasseFriday, 16 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Laura N. GasawayFriday, 16 February
New UK Copyright TermPascal KaminaFriday, 16 February
Re: Sweat and the Database DirectiveTom HockadayFriday, 16 February
re: west copyright in page numbersSJamar[_at_]aol.comFriday, 16 February
"Thin" copyrightsKarjala, DennisFriday, 16 February
Leaning the other way in Princeton v. MDSBruce BertramThursday, 15 February
Re: Sweat and the Database DirectiveDirceu PereiraThursday, 15 February
Georgia AG opinion on fair use (fwd)Ann PuckettThursday, 15 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?J. Christopher CarrThursday, 15 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressThursday, 15 February
Registration software?Charles Glasser/NYU LawThursday, 15 February
re: Are References and Titles Facts?Terry CarrollThursday, 15 February
Re: Internet& Copyright - FT Article (fwd)Martin PerlbergerThursday, 15 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Mark LemleyThursday, 15 February
Re: Photographic ReproduJessica LitmanThursday, 15 February
Re: Sweat ... and WestAlan SugarmanThursday, 15 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesAlan SugarmanThursday, 15 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Jessica LitmanThursday, 15 February
RE: Feist, studies, incentivesYENThursday, 15 February
UK CopyrightCapt James T. KirkThursday, 15 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Sheldon HalpernThursday, 15 February
Re: West and FeistPaul HealdThursday, 15 February
Re: Not fit to print in The New York TimesJason GullThursday, 15 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesNorman SiebrasseThursday, 15 February
Re: Princeton U v. Michigan Document ServicesJames EvansThursday, 15 February
Re: UK Copyrightwing_m[_at_]southampton-institute.ac.ukThursday, 15 February
Re: "thin" copyrightsMaurice RobinsonThursday, 15 February
Re: Photographic ReproduDirceu PereiraThursday, 15 February
re: Are References and Titles Facts?Schatz PaquinWednesday, 14 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Schatz PaquinWednesday, 14 February
Define Database violation, please...Greg ElinThursday, 15 February
Re: Feist, studies, incentivesMark LemleyWednesday, 14 February
National Writers Union in San Francisco Bay GuardianIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 14 February
Re: New 6th Circuit decisionGeorge GaltWednesday, 14 February
Re: Photographic ReproduKarjala, DennisWednesday, 14 February
Re: Photographic ReproduJohn NobleWednesday, 14 February
Re: Sweat ... and WestJohn NobleWednesday, 14 February
Re: Not fit to print in The New York TimesIrvin MuchnickWednesday, 14 February
Re: MDC caseLaura N. GasawayWednesday, 14 February
Internet& Copyright - FT Article (fwd)Mr C A RusbridgeWednesday, 14 February
RE: MDC caseAndrew MartinWednesday, 14 February
Re: "thin" copyrightsSpectrum PressWednesday, 14 February
Re: "thin" copyrightsNick FinkeWednesday, 14 February
Re: UK CopyrightTimothy S. Naprawa Wednesday, 14 February
Re: New opinion (course packs)Paul JonesWednesday, 14 February
MDS decisionPaul SchaffnerWednesday, 14 February
Re: Australian Computer Edge decisionJim LennonWednesday, 14 February
Re: Australian Computer Edge decisionTimothy Arnold-MooreWednesday, 14 February
"INTERNET" (tm) ????Dirceu PereiraWednesday, 14 February
Re: Australian Computer Edge decisionjamie wodetzkiSaturday, 5 September
Re: Not fit to print in The New York TimesDayna BrowneTuesday, 13 February
Re: Australian Computer Edge decisionMARK DAVISONTuesday, 13 February
MDC caseSJamar[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 13 February
Re: Sweat ... and WestAlan SugarmanTuesday, 13 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressTuesday, 13 February
New 6th Circuit decisionJessica LitmanTuesday, 13 February
Major Fair Use Ruling!Jonathan FranklinTuesday, 13 February
Re: EU Green Paper and Database directiveJonathan FranklinTuesday, 13 February
Sweat and the Database DirectiveJonathan FranklinTuesday, 13 February
Re: "thin" copyrightsLGAARD[_at_]aol.comTuesday, 13 February
Re: Photographic Reprodujamie wodetzkiFriday, 4 September
Not fit to print in The New York TimesIrvin MuchnickMonday, 12 February
Pop-up MenusJill GushowMonday, 12 February
Copyright Awareness WorkshopAllyn FitzgeraldMonday, 12 February
Call for Paperslazooli[_at_]grove.ufl.EDUMonday, 12 February
Re[2]: "thin" copyrightsBPTMonday, 12 February
Re: EU Green Paper and Database directivewing_m[_at_]southampton-institute.ac.ukMonday, 12 February
New opinionLaura N. GasawayMonday, 12 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskkcrews[_at_]velcome.iupui.eduMonday, 12 February
Re: Using students' compositionskcrews[_at_]velcome.iupui.eduMonday, 12 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesLaura N. GasawayMonday, 12 February
Re: Fair Use? -ReplyJTSPANGLER[_at_]aol.comMonday, 12 February
Australian Computer Edge decisionNorman SiebrasseMonday, 12 February
Re: "thin" copyrightsMaurice RobinsonMonday, 12 February
P. D. ShakespeareMaurice RobinsonMonday, 12 February
Re: 17 U.S.C.S. 502(a)Bruce HaydenMonday, 12 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSeth GreensteinMonday, 12 February
Feist, studies, incentivesPaul HealdMonday, 12 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressMonday, 12 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtA.KampermanSanders[_at_]PR.RULIMBURG.NLMonday, 12 February
Sweat (was Photographic Reproduction)John NobleMonday, 12 February
Re: 2 questions..Brigitte BENICHOUXMonday, 12 February
Re: ProCD v. ZeidenbergSeth GreensteinMonday, 12 February
Texaco citeNorman SiebrasseMonday, 12 February
Re: EU Green Paper and Database directiveCNI List ModeratorMonday, 12 February
Re: UK CopyrightDavid SwarbrickSaturday, 10 February
Free Law Review Abstract Mailing Lists and Full Text Search Services of ArticlesTim StanleySaturday, 10 February
17 U.S.C.S. 502(a)Craig S. RoserSaturday, 10 February
Re: Photographic ReproduMaurice RobinsonSaturday, 10 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtMaurice RobinsonSaturday, 10 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressSaturday, 10 February
Re: Using students' compositionsCarl OppedahlSaturday, 10 February
2 questions..Dirceu PereiraSaturday, 10 February
Re: Electronic Form Copyrightschamel[_at_]InfoChan.COMSaturday, 10 February
Re: "thin" copyrightsSpectrum PressSaturday, 10 February
Re: Photographic ReproduRichard A. SchaferFriday, 9 February
Re: Are References and Titles Facts?Jeffrey FriedmanFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtMaurice RobinsonFriday, 9 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskKarjala, DennisFriday, 9 February
Re: Fair Use? -ReplyDavid J. StoverFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic ReproduMark LemleyFriday, 9 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesJ. Christopher CarrFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtGreg MacGowanFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic ReproductionsGreg MacGowanFriday, 9 February
Using students' compositionsMarcia MossFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic reproductionJQ JohnsonFriday, 9 February
UK Copyrightemsc[_at_]paratext.comFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic ReproduMary Brandt JensenFriday, 9 February
Backups of cassettesMary Brandt JensenFriday, 9 February
Re: Digital ImagesDirceu PereiraFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressFriday, 9 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesDavid PierceFriday, 9 February
re: Are References and Titles Facts?SJamar[_at_]aol.comFriday, 9 February
Re: EU Green Paper and Database directiveAlberto Maria GallottiFriday, 9 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtKarjala, DennisFriday, 9 February
Re: Aerobics cassettesTerry CarrollFriday, 9 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesTerry CarrollFriday, 9 February
Re: Fair Use? -ReplyCarl OppedahlThursday, 8 February
Re: Fair Use? -ReplyMark LemleyThursday, 8 February
Electronic Form CopyrightsKarjala, DennisFriday, 9 February
"Must Attend" SessionsTRIP10[_at_]aol.comThursday, 8 February
Re: NAFTA? Berne?Julia E. HarmatzWednesday, 7 February
Disclaimers in on-line svcs?Charles Glasser/NYU LawThursday, 8 February
Re: Aerobics cassettesBernard KatzThursday, 8 February
Are References and Titles Facts?Joseph P. RioloThursday, 8 February
Re: EU Green Paper and Database directiveMARK DAVISONThursday, 8 February
Re: Photographic ReproduKarjala, DennisWednesday, 7 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesRoger CarswellWednesday, 7 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesPam SmithWednesday, 7 February
Re: Contracts Watch 2-2-96Sarah WernickWednesday, 7 February
Re: Fair Use? -ReplyRichard TurnerWednesday, 7 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtMark LemleyWednesday, 7 February
Re: U.S. Internet regulationJulia E. HarmatzWednesday, 7 February
Re: books containing media/computer diskettesRuth Dukelow - Michigan Library ConsortiumWednesday, 7 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressWednesday, 7 February
Re: Permissions (fine arSpectrum PressWednesday, 7 February
Re: Fair Use?Carl OppedahlWednesday, 7 February
Re: NAFTA? Berne?Tom BellWednesday, 7 February
RE: books containing media/computer diskettesINTERLIB[_at_]ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.eduWednesday, 7 February
Re: NAFTA? Berne?Jeff AnkromWednesday, 7 February
Russian copyrightPaul K. Dzus Wednesday, 7 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtKarjala, DennisWednesday, 7 February
Re: Photographic ReproduSpectrum PressWednesday, 7 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtJessica LitmanTuesday, 6 February
NAFTA? Berne?Mike BradleyTuesday, 6 February
Re: Aerobics cassettesTerry CarrollTuesday, 6 February
books containing media/computer diskettesMS__HERBERT_at_^academic[_at_]mail.georgian.eduMonday, 5 February
Re: Permissions (fine arRobert A. BaronTuesday, 6 February
Fair Use?Richard TurnerTuesday, 6 February
Re: Permissions (fine arHFC Harpers Ferry CenterTuesday, 6 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)Michael LeanMonday, 5 February
Re: Krofft court cites to Nimmer: inappropriate?Dirceu PereiraMonday, 5 February
Re: Aerobics cassettesArborLaw[_at_]aol.comMonday, 5 February
Re: Aerobics cassettesBernard KatzMonday, 5 February
Re: Photographic Reproduction of PD ArtKarjala, DennisMonday, 5 February
Re: Aerobics cassettesRon B. ThomsonMonday, 5 February
Women's Review of Books articleIrvin MuchnickMonday, 5 February
Re: Contracts Watch 2-2-96Irvin MuchnickMonday, 5 February
MN GIAC Report on Government Use of Copyright and IPS Clift (North Star)Monday, 5 February
Re: Permissions (fine arDavid PierceMonday, 5 February
Re: movie times, trade and copyrightSWARWICK[_at_]zodiac.rutgers.eduMonday, 5 February
Re: Digital ImagesJonathan FranklinSunday, 4 February
Re: Permissions (fine arSpectrum PressSunday, 4 February
Re: Big Copyright RulingSJamar[_at_]aol.comSunday, 4 February
Re: Permissions (fine arKathy CohenSaturday, 3 February
Aerobics cassettesGMCKAY[_at_]BETA.NMJC.CC.NM.USSaturday, 3 February
Re: Contracts Watch 2-2-96Robert M. UngarSaturday, 3 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)Martin PerlbergerSaturday, 3 February
Digital ImagesBrian WillieSaturday, 3 February
Re: Terry's Favorite SubjectLee TienSaturday, 3 February
Re: Permissions (fine arRobert A. BaronFriday, 2 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)Robert A. BaronFriday, 2 February
Re: Big Copyright RulingMartin PerlbergerFriday, 2 February
Re: Big Copyright RulingS. Keith GrahamFriday, 2 February
re: ProCD WL citationSJamar[_at_]aol.comFriday, 2 February
Re: Permissions (fine arVance R. KovenFriday, 2 February
Re: Big Copyright RulingBruce HaydenFriday, 2 February
Re: Permissions (fine arMaurice RobinsonFriday, 2 February
Contracts Watch 2-2-96Alexandra Owens/ASJAFriday, 2 February
Re: A New Twist - Stolen Adsharley i. lewinFriday, 2 February
U.S. Internet regulationCapt James T. KirkFriday, 2 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)Robert A. BaronFriday, 2 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)Martin PerlbergerFriday, 2 February
Re: Permissions (fine arSpectrum PressFriday, 2 February
Re: Public Domain and Old PhotographsRobert A. BaronFriday, 2 February
Re: Krofft court cites to Nimmer: inappropriate?Martin PerlbergerFriday, 2 February
Re: Public Domain and Old Photographskcrews[_at_]velcome.iupui.eduThursday, 1 February
Re: Big Copyright RulingJoshua M.K. MasurThursday, 1 February
Big Copyright RulingJoshua M.K. MasurThursday, 1 February
Impact of Trademark Dilution Act on domain names and jurisdiction?Terry CarrollThursday, 1 February
Re: Krofft court cites to Nimmer: inappropriate?Terry CarrollThursday, 1 February
Re: Public Domain and Old PhotographsGreg MacGowanThursday, 1 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)WARRENS[_at_]VAX2.CONCORDIA.CAThursday, 1 February
Re: Permissions (fine art)Robert A. BaronThursday, 1 February

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:36:07 GMT