Re: Emory HTML claim (was Re: Michigan case draws )

Tim writes,
>
> I see no reason why it should not also be an adaptation or derivative
> work (other than legislative intent in Australia and the UK).
> There are a number of formatting decisions to be made in laying out
> the HTML and considerable effort expended to either write the
> software to convert the PD text version into HTML or hand mark it.
> An adaptation of a PD work would have very limited scope for
> infringement and I see no potential for abuse particularly if the PD
> work is available in another electronic form allowing independent
> creation to be cost effective.

I find this troubling given that most HTML coversions are no doubt about as seamless as conversions for ASCII text to MS Word or Wordperfect. I just don't see the originality in converting ASCII text documents into various machine readable formats without any real effort. If he used unique cross-referencing links, stc. then one would have a different case.

  Don Berman --  

     +--------------------------------------------------------+
     |  Donald H. Berman            |          (617) 373-4551 |
     |  Richardson Professor of Law |     FAX: (617) 373-5056 |
     |  Northeastern University     | Internet:               |
     |  School of Law               |      berman[_at_]ccs.neu.edu |
     |  400 Huntington Ave.         |                         |
     |  Boston, MA 02115            |                         |
     +--------------------------------------------------------+