Charles E. Keller wrote:
>
> Matt used the word "union", i think he meant the term "intersection" of
> the two databases? at least that is the process i think?? he describes.
> it is a bit confusing to me what he did for sure here, or why.
The "intersection" would consist only of those entries that existed in both databases. I think "union" is correct. (Union: "A set, every member of which is an element of one or another of two or more given sets." - Webster's II
Gerry
Gerald M. Bluhm
<gbluhm[_at_]head-cfa.harvard.edu>
Received on Mon Apr 08 1996 - 22:54:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:20 GMT