On 4/15/96, Jamie Wodetzki <jwodetzk[_at_]nla.gov.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr 1996, Dale Dietrich asked:
>>
>> Do they sometimes have to make intermitent copies, however transient,
>> into RAM or onto disk while awaiting downline communications traffic to
>> clear before retransmitting such messages?
>>
>> Do they always copy the message into RAM or disk prior to transmission?
>
> Whatever the answer may be for now, I want to warn everyone about what's
> going on at the Berne Protocol/New Instrument discussions.
>
> There are proposals to include a number of definitions in the final
> treaty language. To date, very few countries have actually made
> suggestions, but there is an Argentinian proposal for a defintion of
> 'reproduction' as follows:
>
> 'Reproduction' of a phonogram or performance fixed in a phonogram
> means the fact of making one or more originals or copies of all or a
> substantial part thereof, regardless of the method used to make the
> copy [sic] or the medium in which it is made, including the storage of
> the phonogram or of the performance fixed on a phonogram in electronic
> form, REGARDLESS OF THE DURATION OF THE STORAGE. [emphasis added in
> CAPS]
>
> As you can see, they appear to be suggesting that breezing onto a hard
> disk for a nanosecond is nonetheless a reproduction.
I guess storing stuff on a hard drive has never really bothered me. If you pull the power, it is still there. That to me seems like fixation. My problem, more from a technical side, has always been fixation in RAM, because if you pull power, you have zippo. And I see the wording above applying just as much to RAM as hard drives.
Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Austin, Texas bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.comReceived on Wed Apr 17 1996 - 04:31:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:20 GMT