Matt Krigbaum wrote:
>
> This is a follow-up question about copyright infringmenet and work
> produced by an attorney. We had drafted some carefully research and
> thoughtout interrogatories and request's for production. These were
> served on the other party and three days later we were served with
> their set of interrogatories. What we were served with is in most
> instances a verbatim copy of what we had drafted. Would this fit
> under copyright infringement or would the doctrine of merger apply
> or a fair use argument apply?
I think it fits under the doctrine of "Turnabout is fair play."
-- Bruce M. Bertram <URL:mailto:bmb[_at_]bmb.com> finger for public key Patent Attorney <URL:http://www.bmb.com/~bmb/> 646 Hyde Park Drive <URL:voice:408-739-9062> Sunnyvale, CA 94087 <URL:fax:408-739-9413>Received on Wed Sep 04 1996 - 19:26:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT