Actually, having the code copyrighted does not prevent anyone from practicing the invention. Generally the invention is defined in claims which are much broader than the actual implementation shown in the code listing. Of course, if the code listing is the only way to practice the invention the copyright is invalid because of merger. But as a general rule, there should be a large number of alternative methods to achieve the same result as taught in the patent. By the way, the copyrighting of parts of patents was recognized by the PTO in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP 608.01v) based on 37 CFR 1.71 which applies to copyright and mask work notices.
Judith Szepesi
jszepesi[_at_]scuacc.scu.edu
Received on Fri Sep 13 1996 - 00:40:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT