From: <johnl[_at_]>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 96 09:34:31 -0400

On 09/14/96, sjamar[_at_] (Steve Jamar) said:
> Well, it seems to me that there is likely an implied license, if not an
> explicit one, for dissemination to the public if you are commenting
> publicly on public matters. But I think that many communications to the
> government are not public and indeed are kept private for policy reasons.
> (Promote candor, etc.)

I agree that many communications to the government deserve confidentiality. Do you think copyright is the proper vehicle to provide that confidentiality?


John Lederer

Oregon, Wisconsin
(Using Merlin--and liking it) Received on Mon Sep 16 1996 - 14:33:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT