RE: Celebrity Gifs

From: Buford Terrell <terrell[_at_]>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:04:41 -0500

Bob Cumbow <cumbr[_at_]> wrote:
> Andrew Friedman wrote:

>> what action could Cindy Crawford take if a photograph of her is 
>> digitally altered or combined with a nude photograph of another 
>> women so that it appears to be Cindy's nude body.  I imagine 
>> rights of privacy and or publicity are implicated and wonder if 
>> the online service would be liable in any way

> Since CC has already posed nude, it is hard to imagine a right of
> privacy violation. If the use were not commercial, there could be
> no right of publicity claim. But this is an intriguing question
> irrespective of whether the person whose face is used is a celebrity
> or not. Depending on what body it is grafted onto, and what that
> body is doing, there might be a cause of action for defamation. Can
> a purely visual image, without words, be defamatory if it purports
> to show an identifiable person doing something that she in fact has
> not done?

Wasn't there a case a few years back brought by a beauty contest winner against a magazine (I think Penthouse or Hustler) for defamation when her photo was altered and used as both the before and after shots in a diet ad parody?


Buford C. Terrell                       1303 San Jacinto Street
Professor of Law                              Houston, TX 77002
South Texas College of Law                voice   (713)646-1857
terrell[_at_]                            fax   (713)646-1766

                 WARNING: Objects in your future are
                          closer than they appear

[T]he strength of our liberty depends on the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech the First Amendment protects."

                            --ACLU v. Reno
Received on Tue Sep 17 1996 - 19:45:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT