Re: "ARS" query from C. Pearson (fwd)

From: <Copylaw[_at_]aol.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 09:34:58 -0400

On 96-10-22, you write:
>
> Once again, read 17 U.S.C. sec. 120. No permission is necessary
> to publish a photo of an architectural work (except of course from
> the person who owns the architectual work).

Correct. My intention was to address query re ARS (and VAGA) in general.

Lloyd J. Jassin
<copylaw[_at_]aol.com> Received on Wed Oct 23 1996 - 13:36:56 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bruce Hayden: "Re: copyright of briefs"
Previous message: Paul Heald: "correction, oops"
Maybe in reply to: Bonnie Holt: ""ARS" query from C. Pearson (fwd)"
Next in thread: Richard A. Schafer: "Re: "ARS" query from C. Pearson (fwd)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: PIJIP-COPYRIGHT List Archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT