Re: "ARS" query from C. Pearson (fwd)

From: Richard A. Schafer <schafer[_at_]mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 23:34:22 -0500

On 10/22/96, Terry Carroll wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Paul Heald wrote:

>> 
>>     Once again, read 17 U.S.C. sec. 120.  No permission is necessary 
>> to publish a photo of an architectural work (except of course from 
>> the person who owns the architectual work).

>
> I think you meant to write "(except, of course, from the person who owns
> the copyright in the photo)," right?

While he probably did, since I believe that's the right situation with respect to US law, don't some of the European countries have different rules, that would require permission to publish a photo of an architectural work?

Richard A. Schafer
<schafer[_at_]mail.utexas.edu>

"Bad hair day?! You're a virgin, you've just given birth, and now three kings have shown up."

Received on Thu Oct 24 1996 - 04:40:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT