On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, tmar[_at_]tiac.net (Tracy Marks) wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
> I am deeply upset by the above situation, and seeking help in regard
> to the ethics and law regarding the issues involved, as well as any
> course of action one can take to protect one's messages and articles
> from more public posting without one's permission. Any and all
> responses - privately and to the list - will be greatly appreciated.
It seems to me that nothing has changed in what you describe. You say that anyone who joined the list could access messages and the archives. The only difference is that you won't have to join the list now. The basics, though: that anyone at anytime could access the list or the archives won't have changed.
I see no problem with what has been proposed. It may be the case that you FELT that everything was in essence private, but that was never really the case, at least as you described the situation.
Harold Federow
<hfederow[_at_]u.washington.edu>
Received on Thu Oct 31 1996 - 19:48:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:22 GMT