Re: NBA v. Motorola

From: Dan L. Burk <BURKDANL[_at_]LANMAIL.SHU.EDU>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:10:28 -0500

On 2/12/97, Mark Lemley <MLEMLEY[_at_]mail.law.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> Actually, I thought Paul Heald had cited some fairly persuasive
> authority to the opposite effect -- that Congress cannot evade
> constitutional limits on its power to act under a specific clause
> by relying instead on the general mandate of the commerce clause.

Paul and I have had this discussion on LAWPROF -- but to make a long story short, you have to first determine what is the power and what is the limitation. See my discussion at 23 Seton Hall L. Rev. 560, 612-18.

To slice the question perpendicular to the usual formulation: can Congress use the IP clause to reach creative activity within 500 feet of schoolyards?

I'm pretty sure it can.



Dan L. Burk
Seton Hall University
burkdanl[_at_]lanmail.shu.edu
Received on Thu Feb 13 1997 - 22:16:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:24 GMT