On 02/21/97, "E. L. Oliver" <oliver[_at_]dolphin.upenn.edu> said:
>
> If you could use contracts in this fashion you could get the double
> benefit of contract rights AND copyright rights with the bonus of
> never being forced to put your work in the public domain.
If one extends the government grant of monopoly by contract---why doesn't one have a contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade?
Is it "US v Paramount Pictures" that is vaguely tickling my mind?
Regards,
John Lederer
Oregon, Wisconsin
http://johnl.simplenet.com
<johnl[_at_]ibm.net>
Received on Sun Feb 23 1997 - 02:05:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:24 GMT