Re: The WIPO-treaty

On April 3, 1997, Martin Magermans <mt.magermans[_at_]student.unimaas.nl> wrote:
>
> I have just studied the WIPO copyright treaty that was adopted bij
> the Diplomatic Conference on December 20, 1996.
>
> I'm not sure whether I have the right copy but I cann't seem to find
> anything about the status of the temporary coy being made in the RAM-
> memory.
>
> Am I right about this or do I really have the worng copy?
>
> Hope to hear from you,

Martin:

Because of the strong opposition from different countries was deleted in the WIPO Teatry text the projected section 7 mentioning temporary copy as a form of reproduction.

Go to the WIPO site (http://wipo.org) and look for the treaties official text and the *Declarations* constructing the treaties text. The US declaration about section 1.4 expressly declare the temporary copy a form of reproduction. Remain to be seen the real value of the declarations in terms of the WIPO treaties application. I published a commented version of the treaties in my legal journal DAT (in Spanish language). Ask for a copy if you have interest and you can read my language.

Regards!

Antonio Mille
ESTUDIO MILLE - Legal firm
Bartolome Mitre 226, (1036) Buenos Aires - Argentina Tel. 54+1+331-8191 Fax 54+1+327-1911
antonio[_at_]mille.com.ar