Re: A mere photograph

From: <Copyrtlaw[_at_]aol.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 14:26:20 -0400 (EDT)

If I take a "mere" photograph of a copyright work, under US Copyright Act, would that photograph automatically have copyright protection or must I put some "skill and labour" into taking the photograph? If protected, is it protected to the same degree as any other copyright work?

Lesley Harris
<copyrtlaw[_at_]aol.com> Received on Wed Apr 23 1997 - 18:32:17 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Terry Carroll: "Re: ROMA: Images of Italian cultural heritage"
Previous message: Koloen, John: "Re: copyrighting of an email"
Next in thread: Robert A. Baron: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Robert A. Baron: "Re: A mere photograph"
Reply: Greg.MacGowan[_at_]Law.UC.Edu: "Re: A mere photograph"
Reply: Laura N. Gasaway: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Larry Urbanski: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Copyrtlaw[_at_]aol.com: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Robert A. Baron: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Larry Urbanski: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Michael Lean: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Larry Urbanski: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Cumbow,Robert-SEA: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Larry Urbanski: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Karjala, Dennis: "Re: A mere photograph"
Maybe reply: Robert A. Baron: "Re: A mere photograph"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: PIJIP-COPYRIGHT List Archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:24 GMT