Terry Carroll wrote [in reply to comments about preventing a
criminal from benefitting from his crime by publishing a book about it]:
>
> In the U.S., I think this would be difficult to do, ex post facto. I
> think the proper means would be 1) to secure as part of his conviction
> a huge fine in addition to prison time, and 2) upon publication of the
> book, levy against any royalties from the book.
This sounds like a useful work-around for the US but Canada and most of the rest of the world have no problem with retrospective legislation (unless it retrospectively makes something a crime that was not before).
Tim Arnold-Moore, LL.B. (Melb) | Multimedia Database Systems, RMIT |
tja[_at_]mds.rmit.edu.au B.Sc.(Hons Melb) | 723 Swanston St -----------------
Tel: +61 3 9282 2487 Fax: ..2490 | Carlton 3053 | simul iustus
http://www.mds.rmit.edu.au/People/Tja/tja.html | et peccator
Received on Tue Apr 29 1997 - 01:35:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:25 GMT