David Post <postd[_at_]erols.com> wrote:
>
> But isn't 'printing a copy' also 'expressly impermissible' under the
> copyright law? I'm not suggesting the distinction Bob Cumbow's trying
> to make doesn't make sense -- I just don't think it is the one the
> copyright law makes, at least not clearly.
Well, it is the making of a copy. So, from that point of view, yes. However, this is a place that implied license and the like would come into the analysis.
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's. Original portions Copyright 1997 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution, as long as the copying is not for commercial gain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Austin, Texas bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.comReceived on Thu May 01 1997 - 13:37:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:25 GMT