I was just reading the newspaper and found the following story (excerpted for educational purposes and not in its entirety):
By Richard Cole
The Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO - If you're going to San Francisco for the 30th
Anniversary of the Summer of Love, be sure to wear some flowers in
your hair -- but also bring your lawyer.
"Summer of Love" is now a registered trademark.
The copyrighting of a name that symbolized the very regjection
of commercial values suggests that the time, they are a changin'
-- oops, that tune is licensed to a Canadian Bank.
Whoa, hold on here. Am I the only one who finds this very weird? The article goes on to say:
[Bill Graham Presents] wanted to use the name for a block party,
and found Summer of Love had been copyrighted years ago, though the
rights had lapsed.
Does anyone have a connection with AP and can unconfuse them? Or is this not stupid and I'm just having a bad day?
Carol Cricow
<carol[_at_]yujean.com>
Who THOUGHT there was a difference!
.. . .
"To lose one parent . . . may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both
looks like carelessness."
Oscar Wilde
Received on Wed May 21 1997 - 21:07:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:25 GMT