On May 23, 1997, James Love <love[_at_]cptech.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 May 1997, Mark Lemley <mlemley[_at_]mail.law.utexas.edu> wrote:
> >
> > For a model of how such a "special" system should work, check out
> > Peru's INDECOPI, a government body with both administrative and
> > quasi-judicial authority which oversees antitrust and intellectual
> > property disputes. The argument for "special" IP enforcement is to
> > avoid problems in national court systems.
>
> "avoid problems in national court systems"?? What might these
> problems allegedly be?
The problems with national courts are in some cases corruption, lack of knowledge of IPR, difficulties to take inaudita altera parte measures, sometimes the information "flows " outside the court and the other party could notice it.
REMEBER I AM TALKING (most) ABOUT PIRACY CASES.
Jaime Angeles
j.angeles[_at_]codetel.net.do
(809) 533-3215 Fax
Received on Wed May 28 1997 - 12:21:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:25 GMT