Karen Porter inquired whether I could explain what either my posting about UCC Article 2B or perhaps the prospect of having an Article 2B means. It would be useful to the whole process, and my meeting my concern that the leadership best define what must be communicated to who -- and find how to do it, if I can get some feedback from list members. So, a brief survey ....
I will complile responses received through June 6 and publish the results by a list posting soon thereafter as well as share the results with all members of the committee involved with Article 2B drafting, etc. Please respond to items by identified number so that I can collect answers as data. Also, keep responses to items very brief -- and feel welcome to send related or additional comments by SEPARATE e-mail; separte because I want to collect survey responses only in a file that I can go back to as needed to review original text of individual responses.
As to Karen's initial question, I'll respond more completely to all when I have more info from survey about the state of public/list knowledge -- and after I've returned from the next Drafting Committee meeting for which I am preparing. It is this week --- in Cincinnati at the Regal Cincinnati Hotel, beginning 9AM Friday May 30, running all day Friday and Saturday, and 8AM 'til late morning Sunday.
You response will be very useful for several reasons, and the hep that you give by replying will be very much appreciated.
David Rice
Member, UCC Article 2B Drafting Committee -- and Prof of Law, etc
<drice[_at_]world.std.com>
Received on Wed May 28 1997 - 15:34:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:25 GMT