On 3/July/1997, Nikki Miller <nmiller[_at_]chq.byu.edu> wrote:
>
> I have a copyright/conflicts of law question. I understand that the
> sweat of the brow doctrine, rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in
> Feist, is still followed in the UK. Is it true then that you could
> extract the purely factual information from any copyrighted
> compliation in the U.S. (so long as you didn't reproduce the
> selection and arrangement), even if it was created by a British
> author and published in the UK? If so, would it constitute copyright
> infringement under UK copyright law if you then distributed,
> displayed, and/or reproduced the extracted information in the UK?
> Would the extracted information constitute a "lawfully obtained copy"
> because it was lawfully created under U.S. law (though not under
> British copyright law) and be excepted from the display and
> distribution rights in the UK under the first sale doctrine?
No. It is an infringing copy, as defined in the UK statute as one which would have been illegal if made in the UK, so copying or display in the UK is an offence
John Enser
<jxe[_at_]olswang.co.uk>
Received on Mon Jul 07 1997 - 22:02:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:26 GMT