Alan D. Sugarman <sugarman[_at_]hyperlaw.com> wrote:
>
> HYPERLAW REPORT OCTOBER 20, 1997
>
> RE: I. ALERT HEARINGS ON NEW DATABASE PROTECTION BILL HR 2652 (LONG)
>
> [Note -- This Report Will be Revised and Updated. This is Version I.]
>
> This report, or rather essay, is provided as food for thought, as
> Congress readies to ram through a database protection bill, one
> introduced last week.
>
> West is back again attempting to push through Congress a database
> protection bill so as to protect its publications of non-copyrightable
> public domain information, now joined by its new ally, Reed Elsevier.
> The bill was introduced on October 9, 1996 and hearings are scheduled
> for October 23, just three days away, by the Subcommittee on Courts and
> Intellectual Property of the House Committee on the Judiciary....
Presumably you (or whoever) means October 1997.
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- The preceding was not a legal opinion, and is not my employer's. Original portions Copyright 1997 Bruce E. Hayden,all rights reserved My work may be copied in whole or part, with proper attribution, as long as the copying is not for commercial gain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce E. Hayden bhayden[_at_]acm.org Austin, Texas bhayden[_at_]copatlaw.comReceived on Wed Oct 22 1997 - 12:14:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:27 GMT