On 3/4/98, Darren Donnelly <donnelly[_at_]slip.net> wrote:
>
> Even the concurring opinion says the majority holds 404(a) "to
> require separate copyright _registration_ of any copyrightable
> advertisements created by the copyright owner of a collective work,
> but inserted on behalf of other persons," and I do not know how we
> got from notice to registration.
The opinion(s) leave a lot to be desired, don't they?
> In any event, my curiosity is to how (or whether) those with
> clients in this are changing their advice in light of the opinion.
Hehe, I've notified all of my clients in the 10th Circuit, which is approximately the same number of clients I have in the other circuits, zero. They were all suitably impressed. :-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:29 GMT