Campbell v Acuff Rose

From: David Post <Postd[_at_]erols.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 09:06:46 -0500

Does anyone know what happened in this case (the 2 Live Crew 'parody' case) after remand to the district court from the supreme court? the parties, I assume, settled -- is that right? Any public info on the terms?

David Post
<postd[_at_]erols.com> Received on Thu Mar 19 1998 - 19:10:38 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: S. Martin Keleti: "Re: What constitutes an exclusive license?"
Previous message: Erik Schaefer: "Re: What constitutes an exclusive license?"
Next in thread: Bob Stock: "Re: Campbell v Acuff Rose"
Reply: Bob Stock: "Re: Campbell v Acuff Rose"
Maybe reply: Leslie A. Kurtz: "Re: Campbell v Acuff Rose"
Reply: Rita Reusch: "Re: Campbell v Acuff Rose"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: PIJIP-COPYRIGHT List Archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:29 GMT