Re: copyrighting of numbers

Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com> wrote, (among other things):
>
> Feist is kind of a catch-22 here: The core holding of Feist, that a
> database is not within the scope of the copyright clause, is precisely
> what permits protection authorized by another clause.

Gee, and I thought Feist held that a database in order to be protected had to exhibit a very minimum level of originality in the selection and arrangement, not that databases couldn't be protected.

-- 
S. Warwick
swarwick[_at_]sprynet.com