On Wed, 6 May 1998, Tim Phillips <phillips[_at_]mail.nhn.ou.edu> wrote:
>
> I think that the term extension violates the spirit of the "no title
> of nobility" clause as well as violating the spirit of the "limited
> times" clause.
Especially when you consider that the award of a title of nobility is referred to as a "patent" of nobility.
> And it's positively funny to see the venerable medieval "three lives"
> lease term trying to re-assert itself in this new context.
Are you suggesting that the term extension violates the Rule Against Perpetuities?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT