On Fri, 15 May 1998, Mark Lemley <mlemley[_at_]mail.law.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> Terry, is your argument that databases are covered by the statute,
> but *not* covered by the constitutional clause? If so, where is the
> constitutional authority for the statute?
What statute? We (or at least I) am talking about a hypothetical statute protecting databases without regard to their originality. The constitutional authority for such a statute would be the Commerce Clause and/or the treaties clause, if enacted pursuant to a treaty.
-- Terry Carroll | "Dreamwerks clearly caters to the Santa Clara, CA | pocket-protector niche..." carroll[_at_]tjc.com | - Dreamwerks Production Group v. SKG Studio, Modell delendus est | case no. 96-55595 (9th Cir. Apr. 21 1998)Received on Wed May 20 1998 - 17:40:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT