Terry Carroll <carroll[_at_]tjc.com> wrote:
>
> Prior to the 1976 Act, there were several judicial holdings that transfer
> of the only existing copy of the work did transfer the copyright as well,
> but those cases have clearly been superseded by the 1976 Act. See, in
> particular, 17 U.S.C. 202.
So my question is this: Are the works that a museum received or purchased (transfer of ownership) prior to 1976 covered under the old "understanding" of the law, namely that copyright transferred with them or was this understanding overturned with the 1976 ruling?
Add to this scenario #2. The artist of one of the pre-1976 acquired works in the museum's permanent collection is a luminary like [insert name of choice] who was a budding young painter in the 70s. Today his work is covered under the life + 50 rubric. Does the museum own the copyright to those pre-1976 acquired works or does the artist?
Christine Sundt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:35:30 GMT